<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wisconsin is Bleeding, Are the Band-Aids Working?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newswithnumbers.com/2009/11/16/wisconsin-is-bleeding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newswithnumbers.com/2009/11/16/wisconsin-is-bleeding/</link>
	<description>Learning More By Reading Less</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:26:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: numbersguy</title>
		<link>http://newswithnumbers.com/2009/11/16/wisconsin-is-bleeding/comment-page-1/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>numbersguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newswithnumbers.com/?p=856#comment-96</guid>
		<description>Thanks Phelps.

About whether there should be a correlation, you&#039;re reading too much into it, but I&#039;ll also partially concede the point. I personally think stimulus should go to making us more competitive in the world market. It bothers me that we&#039;re ordering windmills made in China. But I imagine many people wonder if stimulus spending DOES match up with unemployment. I know I do, so I thought I&#039;d graph it. Additionally I am only tracking STIMULUS. The bailouts of GM and Chrysler undoubtedly helped Michigan more than any other state and the dollars spent there are not shown here.

Regarding the DC anomaly, $200K per unemployed in DC is a tremendous amount of pork. It was a shocker to me. If true, this is national news stuff, yet this is the first I&#039;ve heard of it. Unfortunately it is off topic from where I wanted this article to go so instead of detouring I did indeed soft pedal it. Though I did find some small indication of the sort of accounting errors suggested above. But as I said I didn&#039;t dig into it. A deeper dive may be the subject of a future article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Phelps.</p>
<p>About whether there should be a correlation, you&#8217;re reading too much into it, but I&#8217;ll also partially concede the point. I personally think stimulus should go to making us more competitive in the world market. It bothers me that we&#8217;re ordering windmills made in China. But I imagine many people wonder if stimulus spending DOES match up with unemployment. I know I do, so I thought I&#8217;d graph it. Additionally I am only tracking STIMULUS. The bailouts of GM and Chrysler undoubtedly helped Michigan more than any other state and the dollars spent there are not shown here.</p>
<p>Regarding the DC anomaly, $200K per unemployed in DC is a tremendous amount of pork. It was a shocker to me. If true, this is national news stuff, yet this is the first I&#8217;ve heard of it. Unfortunately it is off topic from where I wanted this article to go so instead of detouring I did indeed soft pedal it. Though I did find some small indication of the sort of accounting errors suggested above. But as I said I didn&#8217;t dig into it. A deeper dive may be the subject of a future article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phelps</title>
		<link>http://newswithnumbers.com/2009/11/16/wisconsin-is-bleeding/comment-page-1/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Phelps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newswithnumbers.com/?p=856#comment-95</guid>
		<description>I think that you have made two mistakes -- you assumed that there actually &lt;b&gt;is&lt;/b&gt; a correlation between stimulus spending and job creation, and you are too kind to DC.  I think it is much more likely that there is no significant correlation, since the spending was targeted at political favors and pork rather than job creation in the first place.  Given that, the D.C. &quot;anomaly&quot; is nothing of the sort -- the kings of pork scarfing simply scarfed more pork like they normally do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that you have made two mistakes &#8212; you assumed that there actually <b>is</b> a correlation between stimulus spending and job creation, and you are too kind to DC.  I think it is much more likely that there is no significant correlation, since the spending was targeted at political favors and pork rather than job creation in the first place.  Given that, the D.C. &#8220;anomaly&#8221; is nothing of the sort &#8212; the kings of pork scarfing simply scarfed more pork like they normally do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.322 seconds -->
